MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100926027 · doi:10.3917/rhmc.571.0119

L'Europe agronomique de C.J.A. Mathieu de Dombasle

2010· article· fr· W2100926027 on OpenAlexaff
Fabien Knittel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C.J.A. Mathieu de Dombasle (1777-1843) est un agronome lorrain connu pour la conception d’une charrue sans avant-train innovante en 1821, et pour la rédaction de ce qui est considéré alors comme la première théorie de la charrue en langue française. Il est aussi à l’origine du premier établissement d’enseignement agricole français. Ce parcours s’éclaire par le contexte européen et la circulation des idées agronomiques : Mathieu de Dombasle ne cesse de s’inspirer des travaux de l’agronome prussien Albrecht Thaer ou des anglais Arthur Young et John Sinclair. Il traduit et discute les idées de Thaer et Sinclair. Longtemps l’agriculture anglaise à représenté un idéal pour les agronomes français des XVIII e et XIX e siècles. Ici, l’exemple de Mathieu de Dombasle permet de montrer le poids de l’agronomie germanique et de nuancer celui de l’agronomie anglaise sur les pratiques et les référents théoriques des agronomes français de l’époque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d’histoire moderne et contemporaineSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207