The Formation of Social-Psychological Competence in Professional Activity of Subjects Two Different Groups of Bank Workers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research of the problems caused by occupational optimization of Bank employees aimed at creating asocial-psychological competence in their professional activity, which is ordered in the labour market. Thepurpose of the article is aimed at identifying the personal characteristics of the subjects of the two differentgroups of Bank employees in their professional activities. A leading method is a method of testing aimed atidentifying personal characteristics such as: empathic abilities, personality predisposition to conflict behavior,ability to listen, machiavellism. The article revealed that the socio-psychological competence of the subjects ofthe two different groups of Bank employees is determined by a set of specific vocational skills, such as empathicabilities, personality predisposition to conflict behavior, listening skills, the manifestation of machiavellism. Thearticle can be useful for selection and placement of personnel in the internal environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it