MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100996994 · doi:10.1504/ijuwbcs.2010.031814

Handling handovers in vehicular communications using an IEEE 802.11p model in NS-2

2010· article· en· W2100996994 on OpenAlexafffund
Balkrishna Sharma Gukhool, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Ultra Wideband Communications and Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsDedicated short-range communicationsIEEE 802.11pHandoverIEEE 802.11uVehicular ad hoc networkVehicular communication systemsIEEE 802Computer scienceIEEE 802.11b-1999Computer networkIEEE 802.11TelecommunicationsWirelessThroughputWireless ad hoc networkQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this article is to show how a caching mechanism can be applied to vehicular networks operating under the draft standard IEEE 802.11p to reduce the probe delay, and consequently, the handover delay in vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications. The authors have developed and tested an IEEE 802.11p model within the simulator NS-2 to evaluate the performance of vehicular applications. The simulation framework is to the authors' best knowledge, the first framework open to the research community that deals with handovers in vehicular networks while operating under an access technology for vehicular environments. Simulation results analysis confirm the choice of IEEE 802.11p as the ideal technology for data short-range communications (DSRC) when compared to other variants of the generic IEEE 802.11 standard as well as the technique used to reduce the handover delays, which, if left untreated, would be a serious hindrance to the optimal performance of vehicular applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Ultra Wideband Communications and SystemsSame topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207