MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101014216 · doi:10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0135

Inverted-hook occipital clamp system in occipitocervical fixation

2002· article· en· W2101014216 on OpenAlexaff
Alexis Faure, Ruy Monteiro, Olivier Hamel, Sylvie Raoul, Jacek Szapiro, Marwan Alcheikh, E. Bord, Roger Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Spine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOccipital boneFixation (population genetics)SurgeryHookOccipital nerve stimulationSkullDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe an occipitocervical fixation procedure in which they use inverted occipital hooks inserted through a burr hole drilled in the squamous part of the occipital bone. Fifteen patients with unstable lesions of the occipitocervical junction underwent occipitocervical internal fixation. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range 2-63 months). No implant failed, and postoperative immobilization was not required. The placement of a posterior occipitocervical graft (for which fusion is uncertain) can be avoided in certain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery SpineSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207