MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101023018 · doi:10.1109/edoc.2008.32

Runtime Monitoring of Message-Based Workflows with Data

2008· article· en· W2101023018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTRACE (psycholinguistics)Programming languageWorkflowXMLLinear temporal logicExtension (predicate logic)Overhead (engineering)Runtime verificationBusiness processTemporal logicProcess (computing)DecidabilityDistributed computingDatabaseTheoretical computer scienceWork in processFormal verificationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an algorithm for the runtime monitoring of business process properties with data parameterization. The properties are expressed in LTL-FO+, an extension to traditional Linear Temporal Logic that includes full first-order quantification over the data inside a trace of XML messages. The algorithm works "on-the-fly": it keeps in memory only the states that are necessary at each step. Initial results indicate that LTL-FO+ is an appropriate language for expressing data dependencies on message traces and that its processing overhead on sample traces is acceptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it