MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101065971 · doi:10.1080/0143116032000160507

Temporal analysis of forest structural condition at an acid mine site using multispectral digital camera imagery

2004· article· en· W2101065971 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. Cosmopoulos, Douglas J. King

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Geographic Society
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceVegetation (pathology)Remote sensingMultispectral imageTailingsCanopyShrubGeologyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large abandoned tailings deposit at a mine site near Timmins, Ontario, Canada has produced significant damage in an adjacent forest due to contamination and wind stress. Significant forest structure changes were measured between 1997 and 1999. A multivariate image-based forest structure index (FSI) was developed using canonical correlation analysis of 1997 field and airborne digital camera data. FSI included decreasing canopy closure and leaf area index, and increasing blown down and standing dead structure measures associated with image spectral, textural and radiometric fraction variables. An image model predicting FSI achieved an R 2=0.66. The model equation was then applied to 1999 airborne imagery to predict FSI for each plot. Comparing the 1999 image predicted FSI to that calculated from field data showed that the model was strong in predicting positive or no forest structure changes, but not increased structure degradation. The latter was due to the presence of herbaceous and shrub vegetation that had developed during the two-year period in open plots near the tailings where blow down was significant. The next research phase will derive means to separate these two signals in forests of open overstory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207