Arrhythmogenesis by single ectopic beats originating in the Purkinje system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cells in the Purkinje system (PS) are known to be more vulnerable than ventricular myocytes to secondary excitations during the action potential (AP) plateau or repolarization phases, known as early afterdepolarizations (EADs). Since myocytes have a lower intrinsic AP duration than the PS cells to which they are coupled, EADs occurring in distal branches of the PS are more likely to result in propagating ectopic beats. In this study, we use a computer model of the rabbit ventricles and PS to investigate the consequences of EADs occurring at different times and places in the cardiac conduction system. We quantify the role of tissue conductivity and excitability, as well as interaction with sinus excitation, in determining whether an EAD-induced ectopic beat will establish reentrant activity. We demonstrate how a single ectopic beat arising from an EAD in the distal PS can give rise to reentrant arrhythmia; in contrast, EADs in the proximal PS were unable to initiate reentry. Clinical studies have established the PS as a potential substrate for reentry, but the underlying mechanisms of these types of disorder are not well understood, nor are conditions leading to their development clearly defined; this work provides new insights into the role of the PS in such circumstances. Our findings indicate that simulated EADs in the distal PS can induce premature beats, which can lead to the tachycardias involving the conduction system due to interactions with sinus activity or impaired myocardial conduction velocity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".