MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101073249 · doi:10.1080/01650420802336975

Attachment site and infestation parameters of parasitic water mites on the whirligig beetle <i>Dineutus nigrior</i> Roberts (Coleoptera: Gyrinidae)

2008· article· en· W2101073249 on OpenAlex
Evan R. Fairn, Albrecht I. Schulte‐Hostedde, Yves Alarie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Insects · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyParasitismMiteInfestationAcariHost (biology)LarvaEcologyZoologyRange (aeronautics)Botany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Larval water mites parasitise a wide range of aquatic insects and may have a negative impact on host fitness. One host taxon susceptible to water mite parasitism is the whirligig beetle (Coleoptera: Gyrinidae). We made 11 collections of the whirligig beetle Dineutus nigrior Roberts from May to October of 2006 to investigate patterns of water mite parasitism on that host species. Mites were identified as of the genus Eylais. Mite intensity ranged from 1 to 11. Median intensity was 1.0 and ranged from 1.0 to 3.0 for individual samples. There did not appear to be temporal patterns in mite intensity. Prevalence was 30.9% but varied substantially over the sampling period ranging from 2.5 to 63.3%. Mites were attached to the metathoracic wings and the body tergites under the elytra. When all samples were considered there was equal use of wings and body tergites but there was temporal variation in the use of attachment sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it