MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101078743 · doi:10.1109/tc.2013.133

Self-Adaptive Context Data Management in Large-Scale Mobile Systems

2013· article· en· W2101078743 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Fanelli, Luca Foschini, Antonio Corradi, Azzedine Boukerche

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceExploitScalabilityDistributed computingOverhead (engineering)Computer networkMobile computingData managementContext (archaeology)Bandwidth (computing)Computer securityDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context awareness, intended as providing the current execution environment at the service level, is a fundamental capability in future mobile systems. Unfortunately, the real-world realization of such scenarios is currently undermined by inefficient context data delivery mechanisms, which introduce excessive overhead over bandwidth-constrained wireless fixed infrastructures. To efficiently offload context access from fixed infrastructures to mobile nodes, this paper presents a new data caching algorithm that exploits peculiar aspects of context distribution, mainly limited data lifetime and interests similarity between nodes in physical proximity, to properly select the data to evict when necessary. Our solution considers a history over past data accesses and information over data replication to better exploit the limited available space. Extensive simulation results, collected in NS2 simulator, support our assumptions and demonstrate that our caching solution improves system scalability while adding a limited management overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207