MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101095696 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.828941

Spectrum Estimation Using Multirate Observations

2004· article· en· W2101095696 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Delaware
KeywordsSpectral densityAutocorrelationSpectral density estimationAlgorithmMathematicsComputationSIGNAL (programming language)Discrete-time signalSampling (signal processing)Maximum entropy spectral estimationEntropy (arrow of time)Signal processingStationary processComputer sciencePrinciple of maximum entropyApplied mathematicsStatisticsSignal transfer functionFourier transformMathematical analysisDigital signal processingAnalog signalTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we are interested in estimating the power spectral density of a stationary random signal x(n) when the signal itself is not available but some low-resolution measurements derived from it are observed. We consider a model where x(n) is being measured using a set of linear multirate sensors. Each sensor outputs a measurement signal v/sub i/(n) whose sampling rate is only a fraction of the sampling rate assumed for the original signal. Based on this model, we pose the following problem: Given certain autocorrelation coefficients of the observable signals v/sub i/(n), estimate the power spectral density of the original signal x(n). It turns out that this problem is ill-posed. We suggest to resolve this issue by using the principle of maximum entropy (ME). We address technical difficulties associated with the ME solution and then devise a practical algorithm for its approximate computation. We demonstrate the viability of this algorithm through simulation examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it