MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101123873 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v2n1p63

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidences from Iran

2009· article· en· W2101123873 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahdi Salehi, Zhila Azary

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityBusinessPosition (finance)PerceptionAccountingStakeholderSocial responsibilityEmpirical researchMarketingPublic relationsPolitical scienceFinancePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is very high on corporations’ agenda in recent years. CSR means different things to different stakeholders but generally refers to saving people, communities and the environment way that goes beyond what is legally required of a firm. In such a position majority of stakeholders look for higher CSR. However, according to this survey there is an expectation gap between actual level of CSR and expected level from the viewpoint of stakeholders. In this survey the authors became to conclusion Iranian corporate sectors have very less CSR from the viewpoint of third parties. It not only damaged third parties confidence but corporate performance also.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.423
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207