A High-Power-Factor Single-Stage Single-Switch Electronic Ballast for Compact Fluorescent Lamps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A very high power factor electronic ballast that uses a single switch in the power circuit is proposed in this paper for compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). The proposed power circuit is designed by integrating a SEPIC power factor corrector with a novel single-switch current-fed resonant inverter. The advantage of this single-switch electronic ballast is that it greatly simplifies the gate-drive circuit design due to the elimination of isolation devices that are otherwise required in the conventional half-bridge totem pole configuration. This topology features a reduction of at least two switches in the power stage compared to conventional two-stage approach for high-power-factor electronic ballasts. In addition, the proposed circuit is also able to achieve close-to-unity power factor by operating the integrated SEPIC power factor corrector in discontinuous conduction mode. The conduction loss of the switch in the proposed circuit is also significantly reduced compared to the conventional class-E single-switch resonant inverter. Experimental results are provided to justify all the theoretical analysis and highlight the features of the proposed circuit on a 13-W CFL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".