MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101185807 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2003.821129

Effect of Pole-Tip Geometry on the Flux Rise Time of Write Heads

2004· article· en· W2101185807 on OpenAlexaff
A. Krichevsky, Heng Gong, D. Seagle, M. Lederman, M. R. Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYoke (aeronautics)Magnetic fluxFlux (metallurgy)Electromagnetic coilRise timePhysicsOpticsTransducerGeometryNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceMechanicsAcousticsMagnetic fieldVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With magnetic recording data transfer rates now in the gigabit-per-second regime, understanding and controlling all of the major write transducer characteristics governing magnetic flux rise time has become imperative. In this paper, we study dependence of the flux rise time on the front-end pole-tip geometry. We examined a set of recording heads differing only in pole-tip shape; the yoke length and width, number of coil turns, and pitch are the same for all designs. We measured the flux rise time by laser-based time-resolved scanning Kerr microscopy and observed that the front-end pole-tip geometry has a strong effect on flux rise time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207