Plasma Complement C5 Protects Endothelial Cells from Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil-Derived, H <sub>2</sub> O <sub>2</sub> -Mediated Cytotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In vitro studies suggest that polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) can damage endothelial cells (EC) by releasing hydrogen peroxide. In vivo this can lead to anasarca secondary to capillary leakage of fluid, protein, and electrolytes. The result is multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which is associated with high mortality. In vivo, circulating PMN-EC interactions take place in the presence of plasma, and we have shown previously that plasma affords protection to EC from PMN-mediated damage. METHODS: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were primed with cytokines, cultured to a confluent monolayer, and coincubated with normal human PMNs. Cytotoxicity was assayed by gamma scintigraphy, plasma C5 was determined by sepharose column elution, and H(2)O(2) was assayed by R-Phycoerythrin fluorescence. RESULTS: Addition of C5, but not C3, to RPMI resulted in EC cytoprotection equivalent to adding whole serum. Removal of C5 from serum using F(ab')(2) rabbit IgG anti-human C5 coupled to CNBr-activated 4 sepharose beads resulted in significant loss of EC cytoprotection against H(2)O(2)-mediated damage, whereas adding back C5 restored the cytoprotection. C5 also reduced H(2)O(2)-mediated destruction of R-Phycoerythrin. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the protection of EC against hydrogen peroxide-mediated damage is partly mediated through complement component C5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".