MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101230442 · doi:10.1001/archotol.132.9.958

Young Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2006· article· en· W2101230442 on OpenAlex
Steve Tremblay, Patrícia P. Reis, Grace Bradley, Natalie Naranjo Galloni, Bayardo Perez‐Ordoñez, Jeremy L. Freeman, Dale Brown, Ralph Gilbert, Patrick Gullane, Jonathan Irish, Suzanne Kamel‐Reid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Cancer InstituteAmerican Head and Neck Society
KeywordsFANCAFANCD2Fanconi anemiaImmunohistochemistryMedicineGSTP1Gene expressionReal-time polymerase chain reactionCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineBiologyGeneDNA repairGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) from young (</=40 years) and older (>/=60 years) patients have differential expression levels of GSTP1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, and FANCG. DESIGN: Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analysis were used to assess gene and protein expression, respectively. SETTING: This study was performed in a research institute within a hospital setting. PATIENTS: Our study group consisted of 104 patients (42 young and 62 older). We collected RNA from 32 OSCC samples (10 young and 22 older patients) for gene expression analysis. Seventy-seven OSCC samples (37 from young and 40 from older patients) were used for protein expression analysis. Five patients were studied in both analyses. RESULTS: Lower expression of GSTP1 (P = .04) and FANCA (P = .01) was observed in the tumors of young compared with older patients. We also detected lower expression of GSTP1 in the tumors of young patients compared with their nondysplastic mucosa (P = .01). FANCA was underexpressed in nondysplastic mucosa of young compared with older patients (P = .01). GSTP1 protein showed negative or low expression in 41% (n = 15 of 37) of young vs 5% (n = 2 of 40) of older patient tumors (P = .001). FANCG protein expression was absent or low in 81% (n = 30 of 37) of young compared with 36% (n = 15 of 40) of older patient tumors (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in expression levels of GSTP1, FANCA, and FANCG in OSCC of young and older patients suggest that different mechanisms may be involved in tumor development through defective carcinogen metabolism and/or DNA repair capabilities. GSTP1 plays a key role in detoxification; therefore, underexpression of this gene in tumors of young patients may cause deficient detoxification that could lead to an increased susceptibility to the development of oral carcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it