MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101238255 · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-1083

Thyrotropin and Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

2012· review· en· W2101238255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCancer Council QueenslandMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterCollege of Medicine, Seoul National UniversityUniversità di PisaSeoul National UniversityMcGill UniversityCleveland ClinicMassachusetts General HospitalCatholic University of DaeguGeorgetown UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsMeta-analysisMedicineThyroid cancerCancerOncologyThyroidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: TSH is the major growth factor for thyrocytes and may have a causative role in thyroid cancer. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to systematically assess the association between serum TSH and thyroid cancer. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using synonyms for TSH and thyroid cancer, supplemented with reference list searches and author contact. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies were identified with TSH the exposure and thyroid cancer the outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Three reviewers independently extracted data. Studies reporting odds ratio (OR) for TSH levels and thyroid cancer were analyzed via meta-analysis and generalized least-squares trend estimation for dose-response relationships. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data extracted from 28 studies included a total of 42,032 subjects and 5,786 thyroid cancer cases. Dose-response spline analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship (P < 0.001). For TSH levels less than 1 mU/liter, the OR for thyroid cancer was 1.72 (1.42, 2.07) per milliunits per liter. However, the relationship changed for TSH levels 1 mU/liter and greater, with the OR thereafter being 1.16 (1.12, 1.21) per milliunits per liter. Studies controlling for autoimmunity reported the lowest OR [TSH below 2.5 mU/liter, OR 1.23 (1.02-1.47) per milliunits per liter; TSH 2.5 mU/liter or greater, OR 0.98 (0.89-1.09) per milliunits per liter]. Six groups assessed serum TSH in relation to markers of poor thyroid cancer prognosis, with three showing significant positive relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Higher serum TSH concentration is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. Thyroid autoimmunity may partially explain the association, but further epidemiological assessment is required. Future clinical research should investigate the validity of including serum TSH in diagnostic nomograms, its prognostic importance, and the potential for therapeutic TSH suppression in thyroid cancer prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.007
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it