MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101275530 · doi:10.1109/rfid.2014.6810725

An inductively coupled passive tag for remote basic volatile sensing

2014· article· en· W2101275530 on OpenAlexaff
Sharmistha Bhadra, Mike McDonald, D. J. Thomson, Michael S. Freund, Greg E. Bridges

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaricapElectrodeDetection limitOptoelectronicsDetectorInductorResonatorInductively coupled plasmaVoltageElectromagnetic coilElectrolyteMaterials scienceAbsorption (acoustics)CapacitanceChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electrical engineeringComputer sciencePlasmaChromatographyPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a passive tag capable of detecting basic volatiles in the surrounding environment. The tag is based on a voltage dependant frequency shift approach using a LC resonator comprised of a spiral inductor in parallel with a varactor. The volatile detector, comprised of a pair of pH-sensitive electrodes coated with a very thin layer of hydrogel, is connected in parallel with the varactor. The hydrogel is utilized as an absorptive medium for the basic volatiles and acts to contain the electrolyte. Due to the absorption of the basic volatile, the hydrogel pH changes which in turn changes the voltage across the pH-sensitive electrode pair shifting the resonant frequency of the tag. An interrogator coil is inductively coupled to the tag inductor to remotely track the resonant frequency of tag at distances ranging from 5 to 11 cm. Tests with ammonia show that the tag has a detection limit of 1.5 ppm. With less than a 20 min response time, the tag has potential for application in food freshness monitoring where detecting basic volatiles is important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207