MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101327022 · doi:10.1109/eicccc.2006.277216

Kinetics of CO2 Capture by Blended MEA-AMP

2006· article· en· W2101327022 on OpenAlexafffund
Roongrat Sakwattanapong, Adisorn Aroonwilas, Amornvadee Veawab

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlkanolamineAqueous solutionKineticsAmine gas treatingAbsorption (acoustics)Materials scienceThermodynamicsChemical kineticsChemical engineeringChemistryCarbon dioxideOrganic chemistryPhysicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the largest contributor among greenhouse gases (GHGs) in terms of emissions. Capturing CO2from industrial gas stream by aqueous alkanolamine solution is the most cost-effective technology available today. Monoethanolamine (MEA) has been commonly used in gas processing industry for decades. In recent years, a sterically hindered amine, 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), has gained its popularity since it offers a higher absorption capacity and a lower energy consumption during regeneration compared to MEA. Blending MEA with AMP is predicted to combine all favorable characteristics of both solvents and overcome the unfavorable characteristics. To date, the feasibility of using this blended MEA-AMP has been investigated through fundamental studies, especially in the area of thermodynamics. This work focuses on another fundamental aspect, i.e. kinetics of aqueous MEA-AMP. The kinetic measurements were carried out in a wetted wall column under ranges of process conditions. The column made from a 100 mm-long stainless steel tubing was fitted inside a glass chamber where the temperature of absorption was precisely controlled. The reaction kinetics was interpreted in terms of overall rate constant. Results show that reaction kinetics of MEA-AMP vary with process parameters including mixing ratio of MEA and AMP and absorption temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207