MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W21013489

Arctic cold spring mineralogy as an indicator of spring deposits, water, and habitable environments on Mars

2012· article· en· W21013489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Battler

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Dermatology and Syphilology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpring (device)GeologyMars Exploration ProgramArcticAstrobiologyThe arcticPhysical geographyOceanographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Springs exist in many terrestrial settings and have supported microbial communities throughout Earth’s history. There is mounting evidence for spring deposits on Mars from Noachian age to present, implying that water may be circulating in Mars’ subsurface despite current cold, arid conditions. Current datasets for most of Mars are limited to mineralogy via orbital spectroscopy and geomorphology from visual imagery and laser altimetry. Much is known about terrestrial spring morphology, but few springs exist in Mars analogue settings, and of those, few have been investigated for mineralogy. This study reports on two sets of cold spring sites in the Canadian arctic where permafrost, frigid temperatures, and arid conditions approximate Mars’ environment. The first are acidic cold seeps forming the jarosite-rich Golden Deposit (GD) in Northwest Territories, Canada. The second are perennial saline spring systems associated with three gypsum/anhydrite diapirs on Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut, Canada: Wolf spring (WS; also known as Lost Hammer), Colour Peak (CP), and Gypsum Hill (GH) springs. Reflectance spectra were collected to determine how similar spring deposits would appear from Mars orbit, and compared to X-ray diffraction (XRD) and inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry (ICP-ES) results. Spectrally, GD appears to consist only of jarosite, but XRD analysis also detected natrojarosite, hydronium jarosite, goethite, quartz, clays, and hematite. In samples from WS gypsum and mirabilite are spectrally visible via strong features in the ranges of all current Mars orbital datasets, owing to their hydrated states. Halite and thenardite are spectrally detectable, but the strongest absorption features lay outside the ranges of the highest resolution Mars datasets. XRD analysis of WS samples detected primarily halite, thenardite, gypsum, and mirabilite, with other sulfates and elemental sulfur. Results from this study are applied in the search for potential spring sites on Mars, and an ovoid jarosite-rich deposit in Mawrth Vallis is proposed as a landing site for future Mars missions. Jarosite, gypsum, and thenardite facilitate preservation of organic material, and thus suspected spring deposits containing these sulfate minerals are excellent candidates in the search for evidence of life on Mars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Dermatology and Syphilology→Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→