MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101367224

Failure-based Lifespan Performance Analysis of Network Fabric in Modular Data Centers: Toward Deployment in Canada's North

2014· preprint· en· W2101367224 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam, Vahid Asghari, Fereydoun Farrahi Moghaddam, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designSoftware deploymentData centerServerComputer scienceKey (lock)Core (optical fiber)Distributed computingSystems engineeringEngineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsComputer securitySoftware engineeringOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data centers have evolved from a passive element of compute infrastructure to become an active and core part of any ICT solution. Modular data centers are a promising design approach to improve resiliency of data centers, and they can play a key role in deploying ICT infrastructure in remote and in- hospitable environments with low temperatures and hydro- and wind-electric capabilities. Modular data centers can also survive even with lack of contin- uous physical maintenance and support. Generally, the most critical part of a data center is its network fabric that could impede the whole system even if all other components are fully functional. In this work, a complete failure analysis of modular data centers using failure models of various components including servers, switches, and links is performed using a proposed Monte- Carlo approach. This approach allows us to calculate the performance of a design along its lifespan even at the terminal stages. A class of modified

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207