MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101413395 · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-02-0802

Cellular prion protein is released on exosomes from activated platelets

2006· article· en· W2101413395 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine C. Robertson, Stephanie A. Booth, Daniel R. Beniac, Michael B. Coulthart, Timothy F. Booth, Archibald McNicol

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrovesiclesPlateletCell biologyBiologyTransmissible spongiform encephalopathyImmunologymicroRNAPrion proteinScrapieDiseaseMedicineBiochemistryGenePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) is a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein, of unknown function, found in a number of tissues throughout the body, including several blood components of which platelets constitute the largest reservoir in humans. It is widely believed that a misfolded, protease-resistant form of PrP(C), PrP(Sc), is responsible for the transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases. Although the pathogenesis of TSEs is poorly understood, it is known that PrP(C) must be present in order for the disease to progress; thus, it is important to determine the physiologic function of PrP(C). Resolving the location of PrP(C) in blood will provide valuable clues as to its function. PrP(C) was previously shown to be on the alpha granule membrane of resting platelets. In the current study platelet activation led to the transient expression of PrP(C) on the platelet surface and its subsequent release on both microvesicles and exosomes. The presence of PrP(C) on platelet-derived exosomes suggests a possible mechanism for PrP(C) transport in blood and for cell-to-cell transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207