MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101435360 · doi:10.1029/2001gl014007

A polar low over The Labrador Sea: Interactions with topography and an upper‐level potential vorticity anomaly, and an observation by RADARSAT‐1 SAR

2002· article· en· W2101435360 on OpenAlexaffabout
G. W. K. Moore, P.W. Vachon

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMesoscale meteorologyAnomaly (physics)ClimatologyPotential vorticityPolarCyclone (programming language)TroposphereVorticitySynthetic aperture radarMeteorologyRemote sensingVortexGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar lows, high latitude marine mesoscale cyclones, are an enigmatic atmospheric phenomenon. With their small spatial scales, their short life times, and their tendency to develop in remote data sparse regions; they remain difficult to observe and to model. In this paper we use a variety of data sets to discuss the development of a polar low over the Labrador Sea that is of interest for several reasons. First, it developed out of the remnants of a synoptic‐scale cyclone that underwent a bifurcation due to an interaction with the high topography of southern Greenland. Second, the transformation of the resulting circulation into a polar low was aided by an interaction with an upper‐tropospheric potential vorticity anomaly. Finally, the event was observed by the Synthetic Aperture Radar on the RADARSAT‐1 satellite. The resulting image of the ocean's surface provides a new and provocative view of a most interesting weather system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207