MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101441648 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.4.989

PARAVINOGRADOVITE, (Na, )2 [(Ti4+,Fe3+)4 {Si2 O6}2 {Si3 Al O10} (OH)4] H2O, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES FROM THE KHIBINA ALKALINE MASSIF, KOLA PENINSULA, RUSSIA: DESCRIPTION AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE

2003· article· en· W2101441648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLomonosov Moscow State UniversityCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKola peninsulaMassifMineralGeochemistryGeologyPeninsulaCrystallographyMineralogyChemistryMaterials scienceGeographyArchaeologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paravinogradovite is a new mineral species from Mount Kukisvumchorr, Khibina alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Paravinogradovite forms prismatic crystals elongate along [100] and up to 0.5–1.0 cm long; crystals in some cases occur in fan-shaped aggregates sporadically scattered throughout a matrix of feldspar, nepheline and natrolite in a strongly mineralized nepheline–feldspar pegmatite. Associated minerals are nepheline, K-feldspar, albite, analcime, natrolite, aegirine, biotite, chlorite, zircon, ilmenite, pyrochlore, ancylite-(Ce), nordstrandite, carbonate-fluorapatite, fluorite, galena and cerussite. Crystals of paravinogradovite are colorless to white, with a white streak and a luster that varies from vitreous to pearly. The mineral is translucent to transparent, and shows weak yellow-green fluorescence under 240–400 nm ultraviolet radiation. Paravinogradovite has a perfect cleavage on {001} and an indistinct cleavage on {010}. It is brittle, has a splintery fracture and a Mohs hardness of 5. Its observed and calculated densities are 2.77(2) and 2.76 g/cm 3 , respectively. It is biaxial negative with α 1.707(2), β 1.741(2), γ 1.755(2), 2 V (obs.) = 64(1)°, 2 V (calc.) = 64°, nonpleochroic with dispersion r > v , with Z ≈ b , X ∧ a = 30°. Paravinogradovite is triclinic, space group P 1, a 5.2533(1), b 8.7411(3), c 12.9480(5) A, α 70.466(1), β 78.472(1), γ 89.932(1)°, V 547.65(5) A 3 , Z = 1. The strongest seven lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A( I )(( hkl )] are: 3.182(100)(013,014), 5.88(65)(011,012), 11.9(58)(001), 4.35(38)(021,102), 5.98(35)(002), 3.085(29)(123) and 2.735(21)(122). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave SiO 2 43.54, Al 2 O 3 6.12, Fe 2 O 3 4.11, Nb 2 O 5 0.50, TiO 2 29.59, BeO 0.76, MgO 0.13, Na 2 O 7.77, K 2 O 0.87, H 2 O 6.23, sum 99.62 wt.%, where the amount of Be and the amount of H 2 O were determined by crystal-structure analysis, and the valence state of Fe was determined by Mossbauer spectroscopy. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 26 anions (including OH = 4 apfu and excluding H 2 O) is (Na 2.293 K 0.169 ) (Ti 3.386 4+ Fe 0.471 3+ Mg 0.029 Nb 0.034 ) (Si 6.626 Al 1.098 Be 0.276 ) O 22 (OH) 4 (H 2 O) 1.16 . There are prominent endothermic effects at 280 and 460°C; the principal losses in weight are within the temperature ranges 150–400 (3.8%) and 400–600°C (2.8%), and the total loss in weight at 980°C is 7.1%. The principal absorptions in the infrared are as follows: 3520, 3330, 3240, 1633, 1105, 989, 940, 725, 691, 638, 599, 568, 523, 459 and 418 cm −1 , indicative of both OH and H 2 O in the structure. The name recognizes the close structural and chemical relations between paravinogradovite and vinogradovite, ideally Na 5 Ti 4 4+ (Si 7 Al) O 26 (H 2 O) 3 . The crystal structure of paravinogradovite was solved by direct methods and refined to an R 1 index of 4.5% based on 4373 observed [ F o > 4σ F ] unique reflections measured with Mo K α X-radiation and a Bruker P 4 diffractometer with a CCD detector. Four (SiO 4 ) tetrahedra form pyroxene-like [Si 2 O 6 ] chains, and three (SiO 4 ) tetrahedra and one (AlO 4 ) tetrahedron form vinogradovite-like [Si 3 AlO 10 ] chains parallel to [100]. ( M O 6 ) octahedra ( M ≈ Ti 4+ ) share common edges to form two distinct zig-zag brookite-like chains along [100]. One chain is decorated by ( X O 6 ) octahedral ( X ≈ Na) and linked into a sheet parallel to (100) by [Si 3 AlO 10 ] chains. The other distinct brookite-like chain is not decorated by ( X O 6 ) octahedra, but is linked into a sheet parallel to (100) by [Si 3 AlO 10 ] chains. Chains of tetrahedra and chains of octahedra link to form a framework with channels along [100]. These channels contain disordered (H 2 O) groups, the A (5) site partly occupied (14%) by K, and the A (1)– A (4) sites partly occupied (15–19%) by Na, giving a channel content of [Na 0.72 K 0.14 (H 2 O) 1.16 ]. The triclinic cell of paravinogradovite is related to the C -centered monoclinic cell of vinogradovite, ideally Na 5 Ti 4 4+ (Si 7 Al) O 26 (H 2 O) 3 [monoclinic, a 24.490(10), b 8.657(4), c 5.203(2) A, β 100.2(0)° , V 1085.8 A 3 , space group C 2/ c , Z = 2] by the matrix transformation (0 0 1, 0 1 0, −½ 1 0).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it