The effect of manipulation of pellet size (diameter and length) on pellet quality and performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal nutrient digestibility in broilers fed maize-based diets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 2 by 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used to evaluate the effect of pellet diameter (3 and 4.76 mm) and pellet length (3 and 6 mm) on pellet quality and performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of nitrogen and starch in broilers. From 0 to 9 days of age, all birds were offered a common starter diet. Broiler grower (Days 10–21) and finisher (Days 22–42) diets, based on maize, were formulated and then allocated to the four different treatments. All diets were steam-conditioned at 60°C before pelleting. In grower diets, increasing pellet diameter and pellet length reduced (P < 0.001) the gelatinised starch content of the diets. In finisher diets, gelatinised starch content of pellets was not influenced (P > 0.05) by main effects or the interaction. In grower and finisher diets, increments in pellet durability index and pellet hardness with increasing pellet length were greater in pellets with a 3-mm diameter than those with a 4.76-mm diameter. During the grower period (Days 10–21), birds fed the 3-mm-diameter pellets had lower (P < 0.01) feed per gain than those fed pellets with a 4.76-mm diameter. During the finisher (Days 22–42) and whole trial (Days 10–42) periods, neither main effects nor the interaction were significant (P > 0.05) for weight gain, feed intake and feed per gain. Increasing pellet diameter from 3 to 4.76 mm decreased (P < 0.001) apparent metabolisable energy values. Neither main effects nor the interaction were significant (P > 0.05) for the coefficient of ileal apparent digestibility of nitrogen. Increasing pellet length from 3 to 6 mm decreased (P < 0.05) relative weight of gizzard in 3-mm-diameter pellets but not in the 4.76-mm-diameter pellets (P > 0.05). Overall, when low conditioning temperatures are used to optimise nutrient availability, small diameter die holes and longer pellet lengths can favour creating high physical quality pellets. The present study also showed that feeding lower diameter pellets to broilers during the grower period (Days 10–21) only improved feed per gain, a response which disappeared as the birds grew older.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".