MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101517281 · doi:10.1586/17476348.2014.899907

Advances in bronchopulmonary dysplasia

2014· review· en· W2101517281 on OpenAlexaff
Lannae Strueby, Bernard Thébaud

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Respiratory Medicine · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineIntensive care medicineIncidence (geometry)DiseasePediatricsGestational agePregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic respiratory condition primarily affecting infants born less than 28 weeks gestational age. BPD and the diagnostic criteria that define it have evolved since the initial description of the disease more than four decades ago. BPD is one of the most common and serious complications of extreme premature birth. Despite advances in neonatal care and continued research into therapeutic strategies the incidence of BPD remains unchanged. Pharmacologic approaches to the management of BPD include methylxanthines, corticosteroids, and vitamin A supplementation. Supportive therapies including the increased use of non-invasive ventilation and careful oxygen delivery strive to reduce injury inflicted on the developing lung. Stem cell-based therapies are a new investigational strategy showing promise for the prevention or treatment of BPD. The goal of this review is to highlight the evolution of BPD and review current and potential future therapeutic strategies for BPD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Respiratory MedicineSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207