Nurses' experiences caring for patients and families dealing with malignant bowel obstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a well-recognised complication of advanced abdominal and pelvic cancers. Often surgical intervention is not feasible, resulting in complex symptoms and an unpredictable course. Although symptom management is a crucial part of nursing care, psychosocial and emotional issues frequently emerge for patients and families. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of nurses from a palliative care unit, in-patient acute care oncology units, ambulatory cancer setting, and the community on their experiences of caring for patients with MBO and their families. Six individual interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Eight overarching messages were identified related to nurses' experiences. Highlights include aspects of patients' and families' emotional distress, and the nurse-patient relationship in relieving suffering. Nurses have an important and privileged role that involves identifying MBO signs and symptoms, having knowledge of treatment and symptom management options, and helping patients transition from a curative to a palliative philosophy of care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".