Endocervical adenocarcinoma and its variants: their morphology and differential diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and its variants account for a much greater number of cases in routine practice of histopathology than they did several decades ago. The varied morphology of these tumours results in diverse problems in differential diagnosis. The overall area of glandular pathology of the cervix, of which invasive adenocarcinoma is only one subset, is further complicated by the fact that there are many benign glandular proliferations of the cervix that can potentially be misinterpreted as adenocarcinoma. In this review the histopathology of endocervical adenocarcinoma and its variants is presented with the emphasis on evaluation of routinely stained sections, still the bedrock of routine practice, relatively little aid being provided by immunohistochemistry or other new techniques, contrary to what is sometimes implied in the literature. Description of the appearance of each subtype of adenocarcinoma or variant thereof is followed by a section on their differential diagnosis. Eighty percent of endocervical carcinomas are of the so-called usual type being characterized by cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and generally brisk mitotic activity. It is sometimes stated that endocervical adenocarcinomas are mucinous but the usual form just noted often has little or no mucin. Pure or almost pure mucinous adenocarcinoma do occur, however, and have an important subtype, the so-called adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma). Although treacherous because of its bland cytological features and sometimes deceptive pattern, a cone biopsy or hysterectomy specimen showing this neoplasm typically has easily recognizable features that indicate the presence of an infiltrative adenocarcinoma. An important variant of usual endocervical adenocarcinoma is the well differentiated villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma, a designation that should be reserved for tumours with grade 1 cytologic features as usual endocervical adenocarcinoma, which is typically grade 2, may have papillae. In our opinion all other variants of pure adenocarcinoma, including endometrioid, are rare and include in addition to the latter clear cell, serous and mesonephric neoplasms. Tumours with a glandular and nonglandular component are also reviewed: adenosquamous carcinoma, glassy cell carcinoma, adenoid basal carcinoma, 'adenoid cystic' carcinoma and adenocarcinoma admixed with a neuroendocrine tumour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".