MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101543355 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.259475

Effects of Force and Joint Angle on Fractal Parameters of the Myoelectric Signal

2006· article· en· W2101543355 on OpenAlexaff
Mehran Talebinejad, Adrian D. C. Chan, Ali Miri, Richard M. Dansereau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractalJoint (building)SIGNAL (programming language)Fractal dimensionChaoticNonlinear systemDimension (graph theory)Work (physics)Box countingComputer scienceMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisFractal analysisArtificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate the effect of force and joint angle on myoelectric signal parameters. In recent years, methods that have been previously used to analyze nonlinear chaotic dynamical systems have been applied to myoelectric signals. Nonlinear myoelectric signal parameters that have been used include the fractal dimension, estimated using the Katz method and Box-Counting methods, and the spectral slopes. Previous research has only examined effects of contractile force, whereas this research also includes joint angle effects. Results of this research suggest that the Katz and Box-Counting approaches used to estimate fractal dimension are not well suited for time functions, such as myoelectric signals. Results from the spectral slope parameters suggest that these parameters can track joint angle effects. A generalized model approach building upon the spectral slope method is proposed for future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207