MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101551451

Computer game play as a potential catalyst for the social integration of people with high physical support needs.

2000· article· en· W2101551451 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jason Liverton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of leisurability · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial integrationSocial needsPsychologySpecial needsRecreationPublic relationsSocial psychologySociologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction While physically active leisure pursuits such as camping in the outdoors, athletics, and other physical sports have been shown to significantly contribute to the social integration of those with intellectual, sensory, and mild physical disabilities, it is important to recognize that many by the nature of their disability are often prevented from competing or participating with able bodied (Roarty, 1986, p.11). One such group often prevented from engaging in physically active leisure pursuits with able-bodied peers are people with high physical support needs. Therefore, to facilitate the social integration of people with high physical support needs, it is important to examine the potential effect of other inclusive leisure activities such as the playing of computer games.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of leisurabilitySame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207