Conjugation mediates transfer of the Ll.LtrB group II intron between different bacterial species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some self-splicing group II introns (ribozymes) are mobile retroelements. These retroelements, which can insert themselves into cognate intronless alleles or ectopic sites by reverse splicing, are thought to be the evolutionary progenitors of the widely distributed eukaryotic spliceosomal introns. Lateral or horizontal transmission of introns (i.e. between species), although never experimentally demonstrated, is a well-accepted model for intron dispersal and evolution. Horizontal transfer of the ancestral bacterial group II introns may have contributed to the dispersal and wide distribution of spliceosomal introns present in modern eukaryotic genomes. Here, the Ll.LtrB group II intron from the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis was used as a model system to address the dissemination of introns in the bacterial kingdom. We report the first experimental demonstration of horizontal transfer of a group II intron. We show that the Ll.LtrB group II intron, originally discovered on an L. lactis conjugative plasmid (pRS01) and within a chromosomally located sex factor in L. lactis 712, invades new sites using both retrohoming and retrotransposition pathways after its transfer by conjugation. Ll.LtrB lateral transfer is shown among different L. lactis strains (intraspecies) (retrohoming and retrotransposition) and between L. lactis and Enterococcus faecalis (interspecies) (retrohoming). These results shed light on long-standing questions about intron evolution and propagation, and demonstrate that conjugation is one of the mechanisms by which group II introns are, and probably were, broadly disseminated between widely diverged organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".