Bis(maltolato)-oxovanadium (IV)-induced phosphorylation of PKB, GSK-3 and FOXO1 contributes toits glucoregulatory responses (Review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last several decades, a large body of evidence has accumulated to suggest that organo-vanadium compounds (OVC) are more potent than inorganic vanadium salts in regulating hyperglycemia and insulin-resistance in rodent models of both type I and type II diabetes. Among these OVC, vanadium (IV) oxo bis(maltolato) (BMOV) was the first to be investigated for its higher potency over inorganic vanadium salts in eliciting insulin-like properties in both in vitro and in vivo systems. While the precise molecular mechanism by which BMOV exerts its insulin-mimetic effects remains poorly defined, studies have shown that BMOV is a potent activator of several key components of the insulin signaling pathways, such as phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3-K), and its downstream effector, protein kinase B (PKB). In addition, BMOV-induced phosphorylation of PKB has also been associated with the enhanced phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and forkhead box protein 1 (FOXO1). Since PKB is instrumental in mediating the effects of insulin on glucose transport, glycogen synthesis and gluconeogenesis, it is reasonable to suggest that activation of this pathway by BMOV serves as a mechanism for its insulin-like effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".