MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101622159 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353588

Manifold Learning Applied on EEG Signal of the Epileptic Patients for Detection of Normal and Pre-Seizure States

2007· article· en· W2101622159 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Ataee, Amirmehdi Yazdani, Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan, H. Ahmadi Noubari

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomapNonlinear dimensionality reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Dimensionality reductionElectroencephalographyFeature extractionArtificial intelligencePrincipal component analysisComputer scienceEpileptic seizureFeature vectorManifold (fluid mechanics)Feature (linguistics)Dimension (graph theory)EmbeddingSpeech recognitionMathematicsPsychologyNeuroscienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, several Manifold Learning (ML) techniques for dimension reduction of EEG feature vectors are introduced and applied on set of epileptic EEG signals. These include Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Multidimensional Scaling (MDS), Isometric Mapping (ISOMAP) and Locally Linear Embedding (LLE). While EEG signals of epileptic patients contain necessary information with regards to the various brain states of epileptic patients, for extraction of useful information in the EEG signals and for detection, often construction of high-dimensional feature vectors is utilized. Analysis of such high-dimensional feature vectors are complex and time consuming. This paper deals with dimension reduction of the extracted feature vectors and comparative analysis of the performance of several manifold learning techniques as applied on EEG signals of epileptic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207