MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

One-Step Deposition Process to Obtain Nanostructured Superhydrophobic Thin Films by Galvanic Exchange Reactions

2010· article· en· W2101622669 on OpenAlexaff
D.K. Sarkar, R.W. Paynter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyScanning electron microscopeCopperContact angleGalvanic cellSilver nitrateChemical engineeringThin filmDeposition (geology)NanotechnologyMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superhydrophobic thin films of silver were fabricated on copper substrates by galvanic ion exchange reactions in a one-step process by immersing copper substrates in silver nitrate solution containing fluoroalkylsilane in different quantities. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses confirmed the formation of silver films on copper substrates and the fractal-like morphological features of the silver films were confirmed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The contact angle of water on these surfaces is found to be greater than 165°, demonstrating water repellency with water drops rolling off the surfaces. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profile confirms the presence of fluorine in the silver films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adhesion Science and TechnologySame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207