MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101630286 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1040416

Shooting ourselves in the foot: why mandatory reporting of gunshot wounds is a bad idea

2004· letter· en· W2101630286 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Merril Pauls

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2004
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGun Ownership and Violence Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationGovernment (linguistics)Position statementFoot (prosody)Section (typography)Statement (logic)Medical emergencyMedicinePoison controlAmmunitionComputer securityLawPolitical scienceFamily medicineComputer scienceBusinessHistoryAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent position statement by the Ontario Medical Association's Section on Emergency Medicine called on the Ontario government to pass a law requiring physicians to report gunshot wounds to police.[1][1] The Ontario government quickly passed a motion to “introduce legislation to require hospitals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicGun Ownership and Violence ResearchFrench-language works237,207