Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile robots could play a significant role in places where it is impossible for the human to work. In such environments, neural networks, instead of traditional methods, are suitable solutions to locally navigate and recognize the environmentpsilas subspaces. In order to learn and perform two important functions ldquoenvironmental recognitionrdquo and ldquolocal navigationrdquo, multi-layered neural networks are trained to process distance measurements received from a laser range finder. This paper will focus on a computer based design and test of this neural system, that includes three neural controllers for local navigation, and two neural networks for environmental recognition, fed off-line by a simulated model of a laser range-finder. These neural networks are the major components of a control system that performs a global neural navigation of a mobile robot, which could be used to perform industrial missions within industrial environments. This control system can guide a mobile robot to track its predefined path to arrive to its final goal through a set of sub-goals, or autonomously plan its path to arrive to the desired final goal, and to avoid obstacles that are found along the way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it