MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101687199 · doi:10.5114/wo.2011.24318

Prostate tumour originating from interstitial cells of Cajal: a case presentation and review of the literature

2011· article· en· W2101687199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Grotthuss, Sławomir Poletajew, Tomasz Dzik, Andrzej Borówka

Bibliographic record

VenueWspółczesna Onkologia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterstitial cell of CajalPresentation (obstetrics)MedicineCase presentationPathologySurgeryImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a case of an extremely rare, atypical prostate tumour, diagnosed in a 57-year-old man, who reported pain in the pelvic area, problems with defecation and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).A giant prostate tumour was diagnosed in computed tomography.The histopathological examination findings from core needle biopsy of multiple sites were not unequivocal.The patient underwent pelvic exenterative surgery.Also Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion and sigmoidostomy were performed.Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumour originating from the prostate and infiltrating the urinary bladder and the rectum.The patient was qualified for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, but he did not give his consent to that treatment.Clinical evaluation at 6 months following the surgery revealed major improvement in the patient's health status, but the patient still rejects adjuvant treatment.The paper also presents an overview of the literature on gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of the prostate. K Ke ey y wwo or rd ds s: : gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWspółczesna OnkologiaSame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207