Real-Time Performance Testing of a 3¿ VS WM Inverter-Fed IPM Motor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental performance testing of a 3ϕ voltage-source (VS) six-pulse wavelet-modulated (WM) inverter-fed interior permanent magnet (IPM) motor. The proposed modulation technique is based on a set of three scale-based linearly-combined scaling functions shifted by 2π/3 from each other. These scaling functions are employed to sample three reference-modulating signals, each corresponds to one phase, in a non-uniform recurrent manner. Moreover, these scaling functions have dual synthesis scaling functions that are responsible for reconstructing the three continuous- time (CT) reference-modulating signals from their non-uniform recurrent samples. The proposed wavelet modulation technique is realized through aTurbo-Ccode that is executed by adSPACEds1102 DSP board to generate switching pulses to activate the inverter six IGBT switches. The IGBT inverter supplies a 4-poles, 1hp, 208V, 60Hzinterior permanent magnet (IPM) motor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".