MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101736097 · doi:10.7202/1001392ar

L’impact socioterritorial d’un « nouveau chez-soi » dans la vie des personnes âgées : une étude de cas dans un milieu rural fragile du Nouveau-Brunswick

2011· article· fr· W2101736097 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Majella Simard, Elda Savoie

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À l’instar des autres provinces canadiennes, le Nouveau-Brunswick est particulièrement affecté par le vieillissement de sa population. Si les conséquences négatives liées à ce phénomène ont retenu l’attention de plusieurs chercheurs, force est de reconnaître que les impacts positifs du vieillissement en matière de développement territorial ont fait l’objet d’un nombre beaucoup plus réduit de travaux. Le but de cet article consiste, à partir de quatre notions centrales dans le domaine du développement territorial, à examiner si un modèle d’habitation issu de la sphère privée peut avoir des répercussions positives sur la qualité de vie des personnes âgées en milieu rural fragile. Nous nous intéresserons plus spécifiquement au cas de la communauté de Robertville au Nouveau-Brunswick. L’un des intérêts de notre contribution est de montrer en quoi la participation citoyenne des aînés est susceptible de faire contrepoids au discours alarmiste axé sur les effets négatifs liés au vieillissement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207