MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101776930 · doi:10.1002/gps.587

A 24‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease—pilot study

2002· article· en· W2101776930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDown syndrome and intellectual disability research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEisai Canada
KeywordsDonepezilPlaceboMedicineNauseaAdverse effectAlzheimer's diseaseDementiaInternal medicineAnesthesiaPsychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Donepezil Hydrochloride (Aricept) is a selective anticholinesterase inhibitor developed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of the drug to treat Down syndrome (DS) adults with mild to moderate AD. METHOD: This was a 24-week, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or donepezil (5 mg per day during the first four weeks, and then 10 mg per day thereafter). Primary efficacy was measured using the Dementia Scale for Mentally Retarded Persons (DMR), and secondary efficacy was measured using the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and by the Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS). RESULTS: A total of 30 DS patients with AD entered the study of which 27 were included in the subsequent data analysis. The donepezil group had non-statistically significant reduction in deterioration in DMR, SIB, and ABS mean scores relative to the placebo group. However NPI scores showed less improvement in the donepezil group when compared to the placebo group. Fifty percent of subjects in the donepezil group showed improvement in mean DMR scores at the end point compared to baseline, when compared to 31% on placebo. There were no life threatening adverse effects associated with treating adults with DS with donepezil. A number of side-effects did occur including diarrhoea, insomnia, fatigue, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Donepezil Hydrochloride administered once a day appears to be generally well tolerated and safe in DS adults who have AD. There is some possible efficacy in the treatment of symptoms of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in this population, although the sample size of this study was too small for statistical significance. It is recommended that donepezil, with the appropriate precautions, should be considered for the treatment of AD in adults with DS as deemed by a specialist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it