MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101780222 · doi:10.1109/icme.2009.5202422

Multiview video coding using projective rectification-based view extrapolation and synthesis bias correction

2009· article· en· W2101780222 on OpenAlexaff
Derek Pang, Xiaoyu Xiu, Jie Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsView synthesisExtrapolationImage warpingComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceInterpolation (computer graphics)RectificationImage rectificationAlgorithmComputer graphics (images)MathematicsImage (mathematics)Rendering (computer graphics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current view synthesis prediction (VSP) techniques for multiview video coding (MVC) rely on disparity-based view interpolation or depth-based 3D warping. The former cannot be applied to every camera view, whereas the latter may require coding of the depth information of a scene. To avoid these constraints, we propose an improved VSP-based MVC scheme based on the following three techniques: 1) view extrapolation, which allows VSP to be applicable to almost all camera views, 2) projective rectification, which improves the synthesis quality when neighboring camera planes are not parallel, and 3) synthesis bias correction, which uses the past synthesis biases to improve the synthesis quality of the current frame. Experimental results demonstrate that our scheme offers PSNR gains of up to 1.6 dB compared to the current MVC standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207