MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101781756 · doi:10.1063/1.1835331

Intrinsic Wavelength Standard Absorption Bands in Holmium Oxide Solution for UV/visible Molecular Absorption Spectrophotometry

2005· article· en· W2101781756 on OpenAlexaff
John C. Travis, Joaquín Campos Acosta, György Andor, Jean Bastié, Peter Blattner, Christopher J. Chunnilall, Steven C. Crosson, David L. Duewer, Edward A. Early, F. Hengstberger, Chang-Soon Kim, Leif Liedquist, Farshid Manoocheri, Flora Mercader, L. A. G. Monard, Saulius Nevas, Akihiro Mito, Morgan Nilsson, Mario Noël, Antonio C. Rodriguez, Arquı́medes Ruı́z, A. Schirmacher, Melody V. Smith, Guillermo Valencia Ochoa, Natasha van Tonder, Joanne C. Zwinkels

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHolmiumWavelengthTransmittanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CalibrationAbsorption (acoustics)SpectrophotometryOpticsCertified reference materialsAbsorption spectroscopySpectrometerLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transmittance minima of 18 absorption bands of a solution of 40 g/L holmium oxide in 10% (volume fraction) perchloric acid are certified as intrinsic traceable wavelength standards, by means of a multicenter measurement on material from a single source coupled with comparisons of a variety of preparations of the material evaluated on a single instrument. Fit-for-purpose artifact standards for the experimental calibration or validation of wavelength scales of chemical spectrophotometers can be carefully produced by end users themselves or by commercial standards producers. The intrinsic (data) standard confers traceability to the SI unit of length in place of costly transfer artifacts and repetitive calibration procedures. Certified values are provided for instrumental spectral bandwidths of 0.1–3.0 nm in 0.1 nm intervals, and information values are provided to a spectral bandwidth of 10 nm at wider intervals. Expanded uncertainties are typically less than ±0.1 nm for certified band positions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference DataSame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207