MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101785952 · doi:10.1029/2004gl020410

First near‐global retrievals of OH rotational temperatures from satellite‐based Meinel band emission measurements

2004· article· en· W2101785952 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian von Savigny, K. ­U. Eichmann, E. J. Llewellyn, H. Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Michael Bittner, Kathrin Höppner, D. Offermann, M. J. Taylor, Yucheng Zhao, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, P. Winkler

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsSCIAMACHYMesopauseSatelliteRotational temperatureLatitudeAirglowEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingAtmosphere (unit)MesosphereSpectrometerAtmospheric Infrared SounderMeteorologyPhysicsGeodesyStratosphereSpectral lineGeologyAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the first time near‐global retrievals of mesopause OH rotational temperatures from satellite‐borne Meinel band emission measurements are presented. The measurements of the OH (3‐1) Meinel band near 1.5 micron were performed with the SCIAMACHY instrument on the European Space Agency's environmental satellite Envisat. The derived OH (3‐1) rotational temperatures are shown to be in reasonable agreement with the CIRA (1986) atmosphere temperatures for the seasons and latitudes considered. The derived temperatures are in good agreement with ground‐based measurements of the OH rotational temperature performed with a CEDAR Mesospheric Temperature Mapper (MTM) at Maui, Hawaii (21°N/204°E), with the GRound based Infrared P‐branch Spectrometer I (GRIPS‐I) at Hohenpeißenberg (47°N/11°E) and with GRIPS‐II at Wuppertal (51°N/7°E). The SCIAMACHY limb nighttime observations provide a unique data set of near‐global OH rotational temperature to study seasonal and geographical variations, dynamical processes and possibly long‐term temperature trends, if an extended data set becomes available in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207