MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101801005 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820f2e4f

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in primary cervical dystonia

2011· article· en· W2101801005 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jill L. Ostrem, Caroline A. Racine, Graham A. Glass, Jamie K. Grace, Monica Volz, Susan L. Heath, Philip A. Starr

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San Francisco
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationCervical dystoniaDystoniaSubthalamic nucleusMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Adverse effectSpasmodic TorticollisProspective cohort studyAnesthesiaPsychologyPhysical therapySurgeryInternal medicineParkinson's diseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been the primary target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat severe medication-refractory dystonia. Some patients with primary cervical or segmental dystonia develop subtle bradykinesia occurring in previously nondystonic body regions during GPi DBS. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS may provide an alternative target choice for treating dystonia, but has only been described in a few short reports, without blinded rating scales, statistical analysis, or detailed neuropsychological studies. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, we analyzed the effect of bilateral STN DBS on safety, efficacy, quality of life, and neuropsychological functioning in 9 patients with medically refractory primary cervical dystonia. Severity of dystonia was scored by a blinded rater (unaware of the patient's preoperative or postoperative status) using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Lead location, medications, and adverse events were also measured. RESULTS: STN DBS was well-tolerated with no serious adverse effects. The TWSTRS total score improved (p < 0.001) from a mean (±SEM) of 53.1 (±2.57), to 19.6 (±5.48) at 12 months. Quality of life measures were also improved. STN DBS induced no consistent neuropsychological deficits. Several patients reported depression in the study and 3 had marked weight gain. No patients developed bradykinetic side effects from stimulation, but all patients developed transient dyskinetic movements during stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study showed that bilateral STN DBS resulted in improvement in dystonia and suggests that STN DBS may be an alternative to GPi DBS for treating primary cervical dystonia. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation results in significant improvement in cervical dystonia without bradykinetic side effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations240
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207