Intervention éducative contrainte : relations entre familles et professionnels intervenant à domicile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les interventions éducatives à domicile en France restent très majoritairement des mesures judiciaires qui s’imposent aux familles. Comment les parents acceptent-ils et perçoivent-ils les professionnels qui s’immiscent dans leur intimité dans l’objectif de veiller à la protection de leurs enfants ? Nous avons rencontré quinze familles, deux fois chacune, à un an d’intervalle. Ces familles avaient en commun de faire l’objet de plusieurs interventions simultanées dans leur espace domestique : celle d’un éducateur spécialisé dans le cadre d’une mesure éducative et celle d’une technicienne d’intervention sociale et familiale (TISF). Les résultats montrent que la collaboration des familles dans un contexte contraint diffère selon la nature de l’activité. Ce critère s’inscrit dans un ensemble d’autres facteurs connus et confirmés par l’étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.052 | 0.126 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".