Viscosity and rheological behavior of microbubbles in capillary tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The viscosity of microbubbles has been measured in capillary tubes. Experiments were conducted in tubes of different diameters and lengths, with a constant microbubble concentration. The effects of bubble void fraction and size distribution on the viscosity of microbubbles were also investigated. Microbubbles demonstrate shear‐thinning non‐Newtonian behavior. The viscosity of microbubbles decreases with a decrease in tube diameter and bubble void fraction, and with an increase in tube length. Although viscosity changes with tube dimensions, the flow index (n ′ ) is only influenced by the microbubble void fraction. It is also found that bubble size distribution in the range (1–12 µm) used in this study does not affect the viscosity of microbubbles. The data were then used to develop a correlation to predict viscosity of microbubbles, which represents the experimental viscosity data with an absolute average relative deviation less than 1.3%. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 60: 2660–2669, 2014
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".