MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aqueous silicate complexes in wheat, <i>Triticum aestivum</i> L<i>.</i>

2003· article· en· W2101857799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Cell & Environment · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSilicon Effects in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExudateXylemSilicic acidSiliconAqueous solutionShootSilicateChemistryNutrientBotanyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The chemical speciation of silicon in xylem exudate from wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) was examined by 29 Si NMR spectroscopy. Wheat plants were grown to maturity in silicon‐free nutrient medium, and then transferred to a solution containing 0.02 m m 29 Si‐enriched silicic acid. After 30 min the shoots were excised and xylem exudate was collected. Within 10 min the Si concentration of the xylem exudate reached values greatly in excess of that of the starting nutrient solution, eventually reaching levels as high as 8 m m . Silicon‐29 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra indicated the existence of only two Si‐containing species in the xylem exudate, mono and disilicic acid (H 4 SiO 4 o and (HO) 3 Si(µ‐O)Si(OH) 3 o ) in a ratio of approximately 7 : 1. Significantly, there was no evidence of organosilicate complexes. Nevertheless, the efficiency by which the plant concentrates aqueous silicon indicates active mechanisms of silicon transport across root cell membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it