Knowledge-based grasping of unknown objects in unstructured urban environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robot-assisted urban search and rescue is an emerging topic in the field of robotics and it calls for new approaches of control. The focus of this work is the application of fuzzy logic in the grasping of objects with unknown characteristics such as rigidity and surface texture. In the task of disaster response, a rescue robot will encounter both living and non-living objects in the field. Then, the ability to grasp delicate and complex target objects such as a human with the appropriate grasping force is a necessary capability. The fuzzy logic controller that is presented in this paper allows a two-finger gripper equipped with piezoelectric slip sensors to grasp an unknown object without knowing the size, weight or surface texture of the object. The fuzzy inference mechanism establishes a decision-making ability similar to the grasping behavior of humans. The present work is part of an overall effort in developing a team of intelligent heterogeneous mobile rescue robots at the Industrial Automation Laboratory of the University of British Columbia. The goal is to have robots with various capabilities perform cooperative tasks that can provide assistance in extracting humans from life-threatening situations. Such tasks may include using multiple robots to search for humans in distress, cooperatively grasping and manipulating objects to assist humans, and constructing simple devices with multiple robots in order to transport a human to safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".