MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2101907834 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2000.897907

FDG-PET/CT integration: impact on tumour localization and dose volume histograms in radiation therapy

2002· article· en· W2101907834 on OpenAlexaff
Curtis B. Caldwell, Kenneth Mah, Yee Ung, Cyril Danjoux, J Balogh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyNuclear medicineMedicineLung cancerHistogramRadiation treatment planningRadiologyCancerDose-volume histogramComputer sciencePathologyArtificial intelligenceInternal medicineImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often unable to achieve local control. For this reason, 3DCRT with dose escalation is being investigated as a means of improving outcome. It is essential to accurately define the gross tumour volume (GTV) for 3DCRT to succeed. Unfortunately, anatomic imaging techniques such as CT or MRI are often unable to distinguish tumour from normal tissue. Functional imaging with /sup 18/F-FDG PET has the potential to define the GTV more accurately. A prospective study of the use of FDG-hybrid-PET images fused to CT simulation images in radiotherapy treatment planning for NSCLC is described. In a significant fraction of cases, the addition of functional information produces dramatic changes both in the GTV and in dose volume histograms for normal tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→