Effect of menopause on the chemical control of breathing and its relationship with acid-base status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the role of alterations in the chemoreflex control of breathing, acid-base balance, and their interaction in postmenopausal ventilatory adaptations. A modified iso-oxic hyperoxic and hypoxic CO(2)-rebreathing procedure was employed to evaluate central and peripheral chemoreflex drives to breathe, respectively, in 15 healthy postmenopausal and 20 premenopausal women of similar age. Arterialized venous blood samples were collected at rest for the estimation of arterial Pco(2) (Pa(CO(2))) and H(+) concentration ([H(+)]), plasma strong ion difference ([SID]) and total weak acid ([A](tot)) concentrations, and serum progesterone ([P(4)]) and 17beta-estradiol ([E(2)]) concentrations. In post- compared with premenopausal women, Pa(CO(2)), [SID], and the central chemoreflex ventilatory recruitment threshold for Pco(2) (VRTco(2)) were higher, whereas [P(4)] and [E(2)] were lower (all P < 0.05), with no significant change in central or peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity, peripheral chemoreflex VRTco(2), and [A](tot). The acidifying effect of an increased Pa(CO(2)) was offset by the alkalizing effect of an increased [SID], such that [H(+)] was preserved in post- compared with premenopausal women. Pa(CO(2)) correlated positively with the central chemoreflex VRTco(2) (r = 0.67, P < 0.01), which in turn correlated positively with [SID] (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) within the pooled data. In conclusion, the relative alveolar hypoventilation and attendant arterial hypercapnia in healthy post- compared with premenopausal women could be explained, in part, by the interaction of 1) reduced central, but not peripheral, chemoreflex VRTco(2), 2) increased [SID], and 3) reduced circulating female sex steroid hormone concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".