MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101952653 · doi:10.1517/17425255.2.6.1019

Glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis: a review

2006· review· en· W2101952653 on OpenAlexaff
Jai Perumal, Massimo Filippi, Corey C. Ford, Kenneth P. Johnson, Robert P. Lisak, Luanne M. Metz, Alexandros Tselis, Mark Tullman, Omar Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlatiramer acetateMultiple sclerosisMedicineTolerabilityNeuroprotectionClinical trialDrugClinically isolated syndromeDiseasePharmacologyImmunologyOncologyInternal medicineAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The past decade has witnessed a revolution in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), the most common demyelinating disorder of the human CNS. After being considered as an untreatable disease for more than a century, six disease-modifying treatments have been approved between 1993 and 2006. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a worldwide drug approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS in 1996. The drug is a synthetic copolymer of four amino acids based on the composition of myelin basic protein, one of several putative autoantigens implicated in the pathogenesis of MS. Three separate double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have established its efficacy in relapsing-remitting MS. Observations from an ongoing study, the longest prospective study in MS therapeutics so far, suggest that the effect of GA in reducing the relapse rate and neurological disability is maintained over a 10-year period. Independent investigators have identified several putative immunological mechanisms of action of GA, with the unique observation of the generation of GA-reactive T-helper 2 (anti-inflammatory) polarised lymphocytes within days to weeks of initiating therapy and sustaining an anti-inflammatory milieu for years in the peripheral immune system and, presumably, in the CNS. Emerging data from immunological and imaging studies quantifying axonal injury in the brain point towards neuroprotective abilities of GA. Combined with its remarkable safety and tolerability, long-term efficacy and neuroprotective effect, GA presents it self as a first-line choice in relapsing-remitting MS, and holds immense promise in developing its potential as a combination therapy in MS, as well as extending its indications to other neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207